MedPAC Considers Standardized MA Plans
During its most recent meeting, the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) discussed the benefits and challenges of standardizing benefits in Medicare Advantage (MA) plans. The goal is to include the findings in an annual report to Congress next year and explore how standardization could help simplify choice for seniors.
One benefit of standardization is that it would allow MA plans to be more easily compared on the basis of price and quality. This would improve transparency and make it easier for beneficiaries to choose the plan that best meets their needs. Currently, the average MA beneficiary has more than 30 plans to choose from, making it difficult to compare plans that best meet his or her needs.
There are challenges associated with standardizing MA benefits as well. For example, it could limit innovation and the ability of plans to tailor benefits to the needs of their enrollees. In addition, standardization could create winners and losers among plans, which could lead to some plans withdrawing from the MA program.
The commission is looking at how other health insurance markets, such as Medigap, have used standardized benefits and how MA cost sharing varies for Part A and Part B services.
Enrollee cost sharing is one of the key challenges that needs to be addressed in order to standardize MA plans. There is a question as to whether insurers would be able to offer plans with the same package but different provider networks.
“I think there’s some reasonable evidence about the challenges of choice.”
The decision on which type of MA plans would be subject to the standardization would have a profound effect on how affordable and accessible healthcare is for Medicare beneficiaries.
The commission also noted that there are a number of other factors that would need to be considered in designing a standardized benefit package, such as the age and health status of enrollees, the geographic area in which they live, and the type of provider network available to them.
“This requirement would aim to ensure a minimum level of access to standardized plans, but its impact could be limited if the plans that insurers are required to offer are unpopular,” said MedPAC staff member Eric Rollins.
Offering both non-standardized and standardized benefit plans may be the best option if there is concern about too much disruption for existing enrollees. This way, they can keep their current plan if they wish, while also having the option to switch to a standardized plan if they so choose. However, this option could lead to less gains from standardization overall.
While some members of the commission were in favor of standardization in order to increase efficiency, others were worried about stifling innovation. On one hand, standardization can lead to more efficient processes and better quality control. On the other hand, too much standardization can limit innovation and creativity.
“I think it is very difficult to get innovation through consensus and even worse consensus that has to go through a bureaucratic process,” ”
The Affordable Care Act's plans will have standardized plan options starting next year. This means that all ACA plans will offer the same set of benefits and cover the same essential health services. However, insurers can still offer different levels of coverage and charge different premiums for their ACA plans.
MediGap plans are already standardized. All MediGap plans must offer the same set of benefits and cover the same essential health services. Insurers cannot offer different levels of coverage or charge different premiums for their MediGap plans.
The goal of standardizing MA plans is to make it easier for consumers to compare and contrast plans, and to make sure that all MA plans offer a basic level of coverage. However, some critics argue that the standardized plans will limit consumer choice, lead to higher premiums, and hinder innovation.
It remains to be seen how standardized MA plans will affect the insurance market. Initial impressions about a standardized approach seem positive, but more research is needed before any decisions are made. One thing is clear, the debate over the standardization of MA Plans is likely to continue.
For healthcare organizations looking to succeed in value-based care delivery models, ForeSee Medical is a specialized software platform designed to increase the profitability of Medicare Advantage risk contracts. Using AI including NLP and machine learning, ForeSee Medical perfects HCC risk adjustment scores, empowering providers to positively influence health outcomes.
Blog by: The ForeSee Medical Team